Blank Da 2166 9 1 Form

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form is an important task for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs). Here are some key takeaways to consider:

• Accuracy is Crucial: Ensure all information, including names, Social Security Numbers (SSNs), and ranks, is accurate to avoid processing delays.
• Understand the Purpose: This form is designed to evaluate the performance and potential of NCOs, making it essential for career progression.
• Follow the Privacy Act: Be aware of the privacy implications when handling personal information, as outlined in AR 623-3.
• Complete All Sections: Each part of the form must be filled out completely, including administrative data, duty descriptions, and performance evaluations.
• Signatures Matter: The rater, senior rater, and supplementary reviewer must all sign the form, confirming their evaluations and assessments.
• Review Counseling Dates: Counseling dates should reflect initial and subsequent counseling sessions to ensure proper communication and support.
• Be Specific in Evaluations: Use clear and specific language when describing performance in areas such as character, presence, and intellect.
• Potential Assessment: The senior rater must assess the rated NCO’s potential compared to peers, which can impact future assignments.
• Comments are Important: Provide detailed comments in each evaluation section to support ratings and provide context.
• Be Aware of Appeals: Understand the appeals process as outlined in AR 623-3, in case there are disagreements about the evaluations.

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form can be a straightforward process, but many individuals make common mistakes that can lead to delays or issues with their evaluations. One frequent error is incomplete administrative data. This includes failing to provide all necessary information in Part I, such as the rated NCO's name, Social Security Number (SSN), and unit details. Each of these elements is crucial for proper identification and processing. Missing or incorrect information can cause confusion and hinder the evaluation process.

Another mistake often made is neglecting to verify signatures. In Part II, the signatures of both the rater and senior rater are essential. If these signatures are missing or incorrect, it can invalidate the entire evaluation. Additionally, the dates next to these signatures must also be filled out accurately. Without proper authentication, the report may not be accepted, leading to unnecessary complications.

Many people also overlook the importance of detailed duty descriptions in Part III. A vague or incomplete description of daily duties and responsibilities can result in a lack of clarity regarding the rated NCO's performance. It is essential to include specific details about the roles and tasks undertaken, as this provides context for the evaluation. The more precise the information, the better it reflects the individual’s contributions and capabilities.

Another common error involves inaccurate performance evaluations in Part IV. When assessing attributes like character, presence, and intellect, it is vital to provide honest and constructive feedback. Failing to include comments for "Did Not Meet Standard" evaluations can raise questions about the thoroughness of the assessment. Each area should be addressed with clear examples to support the ratings given.

Finally, individuals often forget to review the entire form before submission. Taking a moment to double-check all sections can prevent minor mistakes from becoming major issues. This includes ensuring that all required fields are filled out and that the information is consistent throughout the document. A careful review can save time and prevent delays in the evaluation process.

Misunderstandings about the DA 2166-9-1 form can lead to confusion among service members and evaluators alike. Here are nine common misconceptions:

• It is only for NCOs. While the DA 2166-9-1 form is primarily used for Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs), it is part of a broader evaluation system that includes other ranks as well.
• Filling it out is optional. Completing this form is mandatory for NCO evaluations. It plays a critical role in career progression and promotions.
• Signatures mean agreement with the evaluation. The signature of the rated NCO does not indicate agreement or disagreement with the assessment. It merely verifies that the administrative data is accurate.
• All comments are required to be positive. Evaluators must provide honest feedback, which can include both strengths and areas for improvement. Constructive criticism is essential.
• It only evaluates performance. The form assesses various attributes, including professionalism, character, and leadership potential, not just job performance.
• Submission deadlines are flexible. Timeliness is crucial. Each unit has specific deadlines for submitting evaluations, and missing these can impact the rated NCO's career.
• Only the rater completes the form. The senior rater also plays a significant role in the evaluation process, providing additional insights and assessments.
• It does not affect promotions. Evaluations on this form are critical components of the promotion process. They can significantly influence career advancement opportunities.
• There is no appeals process. The rated NCO has the right to appeal their evaluation if they believe it is unjust. Awareness of the appeals process is important for all parties involved.

Understanding these misconceptions can help ensure that the evaluation process is fair, transparent, and beneficial for all service members involved.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, there are some important dos and don'ts to keep in mind. Here’s a straightforward list to guide you:

• Do ensure all names are entered correctly, including last, first, and middle initials.
• Don't leave any required fields blank; this can delay processing.
• Do double-check the Social Security Number or DOD ID Number for accuracy.
• Don't use abbreviations that may confuse the reviewers.
• Do provide a clear description of daily duties and areas of special emphasis.
• Don't forget to include the rated NCO's email address in the correct format (.gov or .mil).
• Do review the entire form for completeness before submission.